>there is a multiverse where every possibility exists in some universe (2024)

There would be an infinite amount of all-powerful entities.
But an all-powerful entity would not be able to eliminate another all-powerful entity from a slightly different parallel universe, so they wouldn't be all powerful

>There would be an infinite amount of all-powerful entities.
One of the traits of this creator would be that it created everything. Thus the existence of alternate all powerful beings would be his choosing. The only caveat to everything existing that could exist is the idea that an all powerful being decided for something not to exist.

So God existed before the multiverse and he actually created it?
Be we just said the multiverse contains every single possibility.
Therefore it must contain other all-powerful entities, which leads to a contradiction

If a being is limited by anything then it isn't "all-powerful", once you acknowledge that there are impossible things (like making a square a circle) then you acknowledge that the being isn't actually "all-powerful". Whatever is imposing limits on the supposedly "all-powerful" being is more powerful than it.

>Whatever is imposing limits on the supposedly "all-powerful" being is more powerful than it.
Logical contradiction in our linguistic failings is not a flaw of God. It's a flaw of our communication. Just because we can say it, doesn't make it a thing.

It's not a logical contradiction idiot, the immaterial world of forms that defines what's possible and impossible and limits God's actions is more powerful than him because it limits him, it prevents him from ever being defined as "all-powerful"

Omnipotence just means one can do anything that can be done. Your insistence that our linguistic failings equate to problems in omnipotence is your own issue.

They aren't linguistic failings moron, omnipotence means one can do anything without limitation, the immaterial world of forms limits God because it defines what's possible and impossible, God can only have unlimited ability to manifest existing forms but he can never be more powerful than the immaterial world of forms that spawned him because it limits him

>ipotence means one can do anything without limitation,
It doesn't. It means one can do anything that is possible. Possibility is the limitation, de facto. Saying that an omnipotent being can make linguistic paradoxes real just means you're a midwit.

Oh ok. Then God is an impossibility because there is no such thing as an uncaused cause.
A cannot ever be B. Nothing will never just be something. It's logically impossible.

>everything possible will occur in the multiverse" then you try to argue that God can't be killed because he's "all-powerful"
Yes, because killing an all powerful being is by definition impossible. Simple stuff.

If the "all-powerful" quality was transferred to something else then God wouldn't be all-powerful anymore and he could be killed by the new all-powerful being. You can't prove that all-powerfulness can't be transferred from God to something else.

If he's not metaphysically necessary, how could he have created everything? Is god's existence a brute fact?